This post, written by Taylor Williamson and Derick Brinkerhoff, Health Policy Project, RTI International, originally appeared on the LMG For Health Project blog.
The Third Global Governance for Health Roundtable will be held in Cape Town, South Africa September 29-30th prior the the Third Global Symposium on Health Systems Research. The Leadership, Management & Governance (LMG) Project is collaborating on the Roundtable with the Health Policy Project and the Health Finance and Governance Project.
Maternity care is free in Kenyan hospitals.Nearly 91% of Rwanda’s population is enrolled in a health insurance scheme. There are 2.4 million people on antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. What links these well-known examples of health system successes? Strong political will to improve health in these countries.
Political will is often only discussed in terms of its absence. How often have health systems experts heard that reform efforts were not achieved due to changes in the Ministry of Health, or that reform momentum ceased when donor funding ended?
Focusing on implementation failures reduces the concept of political will to the willingness and capacity of country officials to take responsibility for donor-funded programs. For example, country officials are often willing to have donors fund programs, but balk at implementing complicated reforms or including donor priorities in national budgets.
The strength of a health system, however, depends on what country actors are willing and able to do, not just what donors will fund. To incorporate the perspectives of these country actors into the concept of political will, the USAID-funded Health Policy Project proposes a different approach to thinking about political will.
Reframing political will as the commitment of health system actors to act on policy objectives and sustain the costs of those actions over time can move country officials to the forefront of reform efforts. This approach places the responsibility of driving the reform process on country officials, who must formulate policy, implement programs that achieve their objectives, fund budgets to implement programs, and monitor program outcomes. Even when donor funding is available, political will requires the leadership of country officials to fulfill these roles.
Policymakers, implementers, and citizens are faced with the following questions that can inform the efforts of health systems experts to understand political will:
- Where does the power to enact reforms rest? Are the willingness and capacity of individual decisionmakers, specific institutions, and/or a broader network of stakeholders taken into account?
- What are the intentions of various health sector actors? What motivates them to improve health systems? Can we infer that political will exists by observing budget allocations or public speeches?
- Finally, what is the impact of civil society advocates? The media? Health providers? What about government structures and processes? Local variations in these influences can significantly affect the politics of health reform.
Based on these considerations, Derick Brinkerhoff, RTI International Distinguished Fellow in International Public Management, developed a model of political will that highlights seven components:
- Government initiative for policies and programs
- Choice of policies and programs based on scientific evidence and technically sound options
- Mobilization of stakeholders
- Public commitment and allocation of resources
- Design and application of credible incentives
- Continuity of effort
- Learning and adaptation
These components can be rated on a sliding scale to capture degrees of political will, from weak to strong. They can also help health systems practitioners gain a greater appreciation for the political environment that supports health to improve their work identifying gaps and recommending reforms.
Reconsidering the “implementation failure” approach and applying a more rigorous analytical framework to political will can move health systems much closer to the goal of strengthening health systems for the long run, an aim shared by country officials, their citizens, and the international community.